Tag Archives: eyewitness

Luke’s Apparent Eyewitness Testimony!

Eyewitness Testimony - 1

from Google Images

When we consider the reasoning among the Apostles in Luke 9:46 and John’s statement in Luke 9:49, we are forced to ask: which mission was more important: sending out the Twelve (Luke 9:1-6) or sending out the Seventy (Luke 10:1-16)? Nevertheless, we must conclude that neither is more important than the other (1Corinthains 3:4-6). Having said this, to what might we account for the greater detail we find in Luke 10:1-12 when it is compared to Luke 9:1-6? Read the rest of this entry »


Posted by on April 27, 2017 in Gospel of Luke


Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Luke’s Preface

Ceartanty of Jesus

from Google Images

There have been many presumptions made about the author of Luke’s Gospel narrative, and about how he formulated his narrative and what his purpose was with respect to his recipient, Theophilus, and by extension to us, Luke’s larger audience. It may be fun to explore these ideas further. I hope to do this not only by demanding proof of our more traditional assumptions about Luke and his labor in the Gospel, but also by presenting an alternative perspective that may fit the context of his work better. Read the rest of this entry »


Posted by on April 10, 2016 in Gospel of Luke


Tags: , , , , , , ,

The Anonymous Disciple

Road to Emmaus

from Google Images

Near the end of his Gospel narrative Luke tells us of an event whereby the resurrected Lord appeared to perhaps the first two male disciples (Luke 24:13-33). While it is possible that the Lord appeared first to Peter (Simon, cf. Luke 24:34), certainly Jesus’ appearance to the two in route to Emmaus came soon after he appeared to the women. One of the two was Cleopas (Luke 24:18), but the other remains anonymous. Therefore, the story of this appearance of Jesus comes from one of these two men. If we owe it to Clopas, it is odd that he doesn’t name the other disciple. If we owe this record to the unidentified disciple, it is odd that Luke doesn’t name his source. What can be said of these things? Read the rest of this entry »

Comments Off on The Anonymous Disciple

Posted by on March 29, 2016 in Gospel of Luke


Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Was Luke an Eyewitness?


from Google Images

The idea that Luke couldn’t be an eyewitness of Jesus’ teaching and work comes from the fact that most Biblical scholars believe his Gospel was written later in the 1st century AD, perhaps in the 80s, but some would date it even later. Therefore, the premise of Luke being an eyewitness seems out of the question, and even the proposition that there existed eyewitnesses of Jesus ministry at these late dates seems improbable, unless they were quite young witnesses at the time; for example, a witness in his 20s during Jesus’ ministry would be at least in his 70s by the time of the most accepted date for writing Luke. What can we say of these things? Read the rest of this entry »


Posted by on March 27, 2016 in Gospel of Luke


Tags: , , , , , ,

Cooperative Effort Produces Eternal Results!

The sources of Luke’s gospel are the records given him by many eyewitnesses (Luke 1:2). That is, he was not the eyewitness, but his record is an account of the eyewitness testimony of others. This included the testimony of the Twelve (verse-2), which was believed by so many throughout the world (verse-1), of which Theophilus is an example (verse-3). Read the rest of this entry »

Comments Off on Cooperative Effort Produces Eternal Results!

Posted by on August 21, 2009 in Body of Christ, Religion


Tags: , , , , , , ,